Back the bees and friends
Back the bees and friends – big agriculture has the chance to help or hinder our most important pollinators
New research published today in PeerJ has identified the most serious future threats to, but also opportunities for pollinating species, which provide essential agricultural and ecological services across the globe.
From the expansion of corporate agriculture, new classes of insecticides and emerging viruses, pollinators are facing changing and increasingly challenging risks. In response, researchers are calling for global policies of proactive prevention, rather than reactive mitigation to ensure the future of these vital species.
The study was conducted by an international group of scientists, government researchers, and NGOs led by Professor Mark Brown from Royal Holloway University of London, supported by the EU-funded network SuperB.
They used a method of horizon scanning to identify future threats that require preventative action, and opportunities to be taken advantage of, in order to protect the insects, birds, mammals, and reptiles that #pollinate wild flowers and crops.
Professor Brown said: “35 percent of global crop production, and 85 percent of wild flowering plants rely on hard-working pollinators to thrive. We are increasingly adopting practices that damage these species. Then, we rather absurdly look to mitigate their loss, rather than prevent it in the first place.
“This is an expensive and back-to-front solution for a problem that has very real consequences for our well-being. Most research focuses on the battles already being fought, not on the war to come.”
Out of a long-list of sixty risks to, and opportunities for pollinators the team identified six high-priority issues, including:
1) Corporate control of agriculture at the global scale
2) Sulfoximine, a novel systemic class of insecticides
3) New emerging viruses
4) Increased diversity of managed pollinator species
5) Effects of extreme weather under climate change
6) Reductions in chemical use in non-agricultural settings
The research highlights consolidation of the agri-food industries as a major potential threat to pollinators, with a small numbers of companies now having unprecedented control of land.
The rise in transnational land deals for crop production, for example, the use of large areas of Brazil for soybean export to China, now occupies over 40 million hectares.
Sarina Jepsen, Director of Endangered Species and Aquatic Programs, The Xerces Society and Deputy Chair, IUCN Bumblebee Specialist Group, said: “The homogenization of agriculture effectively means that corporations are applying blanket production systems to landscapes that are vastly different, significantly reducing the diversity and number of native pollinators.”
Professor Brown continued: “However, it is not all doom and gloom. For example, such global domination provides an opportunity to influence land-management to make it favourable for pollinators at huge scales, but this would require the agri-food industry to work closely together with NGOs and researchers.”
Speaking about the influence of new insecticides, co-author, Lynn Dicks from the Department of Zoology at the University of Cambridge said: “Identifying environmental issues in advance, before they become large-scale, allows society to plan responses and reduce environmental risks before they are upon us.
“It is a routine part of strategic planning in financial management, and it should also be routine in environmental planning and policymaking. Many of the pollinator issues we identified on the horizon can be responded to right now, for example by working with corporations already controlling large areas of agricultural land to develop pollinator management strategies, or by planning research on the sub-lethal effects of sulfoxaflor before it is widely used.”
However, the study also found more explicitly positive opportunities for pollinators. For example, the current and future reduction of chemical use in non-agricultural land, gardens, and parks, could be fruitful for pollinator populations.
Dr Katherine Baldock said: “Previous research led by the University of Bristol indicates the value of urban areas for pollinators.
“Chemicals with potentially negative impacts on pollinators are widely used in urban areas and in the wider landscape, including golf courses.
“This means that there are huge opportunities to improve both public and private greenspaces for pollinating insects. Developing alternative approaches to chemical use should be a priority, and everyone with a garden can do their bit to help through using fewer chemicals.”
Professor Brown concluded: “We must continue to encourage these practices across industry, government, and the public so that we give our important pollinating species the support they need to do their vital work.”
About the Cabot Institute
The Cabot Institute drives world-leading research on how we depend on, live with and affect our planet. It stimulates new thinking and strives for new innovations to meet our social and environmental challenges. Its communities focus on six crucial areas: global environmental change, food, water, low carbon energy, natural hazards and future cities and communities. Each community is driven by outstanding academics with government, industry and society partners from across the globe. Working together, they seek radical and integrated solutions to 21st-century challenges.